Friday, December 5, 2025

In a few words:

Supreme Court sides with Texas on new map, potentially helping Republicans keep House control.

More details:

🧩 Simple Version

The Supreme Court said Texas can use its new map for congressional elections. A lower court had said the map might be unfair because it was drawn based on race. But the Supreme Court said the lower court was too quick to interfere, especially close to elections. They think the map was mostly about politics, not race, and federal courts shouldn't get involved in those kinds of state decisions so late.

🚨 How Fox Would Spin It

LIBERAL JUDGES TRY TO STOP TEXAS! The Fake News Supreme Court, pushed by the radical left, tried to block Texas from using its "Big Beautiful Map." But President Trump's Supreme Court appointees stood strong, saving our democracy from a partisan takeover and keeping Texas RED! This is a win against the woke mob!

DeFoxed Reality Check

The Supreme Court allowed Texas to use a new congressional map for upcoming elections. This map is expected to help Republicans win more seats in the House, which is currently controlled by a slim GOP majority. A lower court had previously blocked the map, saying it might have been drawn with race as a primary factor, which can be unconstitutional. The Supreme Court disagreed, arguing that the lower court shouldn't have stepped in so close to the election deadline and that the map was likely drawn for partisan advantage, which they generally don't review. Justices Kagan, Sotomayor, and Jackson dissented, arguing the majority ignored evidence that race was a key factor and that this decision harms minority voters.

💡 Why This Matters

This decision could directly impact which party controls the House of Representatives for the rest of President Trump's term. It also touches on important legal questions about when courts should intervene in election maps and how race can be considered (or not considered) in redistricting. The disagreement among the justices highlights ongoing debates about voting rights and the role of the Supreme Court in election disputes.